My theory is that, overall, Spanish and Portuguese are the same language (which is a corollary of my theorem that in Europe there are only five languages: Western European stuff, Eastern European stuff, Basque language, Hungarian and Finnish). Same alphabet, same reading direction, same language structure (subject, verb, object), thousands of shared words, etc.
So I have been dismissive of Spanish as a language distinct from Portuguese. But naturally that's just the elitist me talking, because that's not how anything works in real life.
In the last couple of years, I spent a bit longer time interacting with people from Latin America. Many of them are folks for whom Spanish is already a foreign language (on top of a few native languages), so Latin languages do not look natural at all to them.
The point is that I understand Spanish using my Portuguese but the Portunhol that I used to speak is not necessarily comprehensible for Spanish-speakers.
I decided to learn Spanish.
But I don't have time for classes and also hate self-learning. And I surely hated all language apps: they don't have any philosophy of pedagogy, rather they are driven by user engagement so they are more gamified and less useful.
Then I met Language Transfer.
It's a website. There is also an application. In any case, there is nothing app-like about it.
It consists of 10-minute classes which are just audio files that you need to listen.
Besides the teacher, the classes are assisted by a student who is learning the language at that moment. Whenever there is a question, you are expected to pause the audio and do those exercises before the student. So each class takes maybe 15 minutes.
A complete Spanish course takes 90 classes. They also have Swahili, Italian, Greek, German, Turkish, Arabic and Japanese. (In these, the language of instruction is English. There is also an English course for Spanish-speakers.)
The underlying pedagogical philosophy is that we learn by getting used to things. (This is not only about language. It's about everything) Language Transfer has the Thinking Method and a blog, but Victor Wooten's talk convinced me better:
If we agree with this, then there is a natural conclusion: The fastest and most solid learning method is by associating new information into existing information. That's why the base language matters and that's why the word "transfer" is important.
Language Transfer starts off with the same hypothesis as my theory above: If you speak English, then you have immediate access to a big chunk of Spanish. By consolidating it and by learning how to transfer (what to transfer, what not to transfer, what changes to implement while transferring), you can learn the language very quickly.
Another conclusion: What matters is to get the right intuition on the language you are learning. Therefore, one, vocabulary is not covered in the lectures, because that's just memorizing and not part of the learning process; and two, grammar rules only matter in as much as they reveal patterns in the language.
All of this further has implications on the curriculum: They discard entirely the linear order of learning one verb and all its conjugations, as well as the chunky sessions of memorizing names of kitchenware. Instead, they teach whatever is necessary to get the intuition right. The rest we will learn only in practice anyway (and will forget as we stop practicing, like I did with German).
To summarize, I am a big fan of Language Transfer.
I just finished the Spanish classes. We covered all tenses and conjugations. (We covered maybe a total of 50 words in total in order to do this.) This, in 90 classes of 15 minutes each.
So here is my celebration that I can now confidently say that I am fluent enough to survive sophisticated conversations in Spanish.









